When I talk about primality capital, I'm talking about the format by which emotions/ experience are compiled/ arranged/ understood. Everyone has their own model. When I talk about primality I'm talking about the fashion of mind/ a pattern of mind that takes all of the values of looks, money, status, competence, game, etc. There is no such thing as emotional quality that isn't vacuous because emotions are so varied and situational. Measuring the intensity of emotions can be summed up in a linear one channel scale. But it's too unspecific if you just use one scale of "emotional intensity" without explaining away the components/ sorts of emotions. Even saying that the "emotional capital is high" is kind of vacuous because what is the hierarchy even measuring ABOUT emotions? When I talk about primality capital, I am saying that it is in relation to people's experiences/ emotions. And so it is. But those are mere subjective scales, as there are so many different sorts of things that can be taken from two of those resources of information reception. But it's still vacuous to say that experience/ emotional capital, because it doesn't clarify what kind of stimulus there is. If you say flesh capital that can have some merit to understanding idk, how much human a cyborg is. But for this scenario we need to have a certain clarification of what kind of emotional/ experience capital. We can talk about how emotion/ experience are just colloquial phrasings of "game" but still, it's too vague. And it doesn't column the sort of emotional/ experiential stimulus women truly value.It's more like "emotional / experience capital" and just to let you in on a secret, it's the reason why everyone does anything in the first place.
It would be like saying molecule capital comprises things. Okay, but what kind of molecules?
Don't know what you're referencing. I'm just saying cultural marxism puts a belief system in people's brains that's ultimately plebby. Makes them unaware of the biological basis they live by. Just broad brush strokes of fairy braided bullshit. Makes them without the drive to opt to be objective, it just makes them more trendy/ coddlesome/ willing to help the oppressed and be euphemistic with their sense of socialism/ humanitarianism/ egalitarianism/ etc.It's to feel a certain way and have a certain experience. And that is not "cultural marxism" it's simply a objective fact.
uhThe objective facts do matter, but only insofar as tools to manipulate that subjective reality. We only care about them for that reason in the first place, not cause of actual truth or objectivity.
Baseness is the biological basis. Hunger for power, to manipulate subjective reality? of course. No one feels whole in just examining the universe. So either what I say to you holds merit here and now, or zilch. I've already gauged that from your retarded frame of mind.Why the fuck else would you do anything to begin with?
You're so retarded. Truth is the concept concerning a thing having an indeed valid existence. It's through feeling and experience that we humanity glean validity/ invalidity. A Fact is just a truth without any medium of perception available to validate its invalidity credibly. (Which is why I often believe that not all facts are invulnerably verified). (Because credibility of validity is not always so easily disseminated into the conscious minds of mankind, as some things are irrevocably ascertained in our subconscious, like the sun being hot, the deserts being dry, the snow being cold and the trees being wooden. But there are some things, like Islam as a whole casualties 200 million people, or the fact that Karl Marx created communism, these things do not so easily enter the conscience of mankind. There is no evolutionary incentive in our animalistic cerebrum to remember facts from history. And history is built upon record. It's foolhardy to say that any event in history is an ABSOLUTE fact, but is likely an irrefutable fact for no one exists to contrast it, and if it's plausible enough from the observers of the record to have nothing to go on in denying it. Unlike Jesus and multiplying loaves and fishes. And Muhammad who ran from Arabia to Jerusalem on a donkey in the middle of the night. That's definitely bullshit.Truth itself is a feeling and experience, you cannot disconnect the two
DurrI am theorizing that human beings have deeply wired social emotional aspects to their brain and that these aspects are also able to be influenced and manipulated by cues from other human beings relayed through the senses by behaviors of other humans.
DurrrTo the extent that emotional / mental states and beliefs (which influence the former) are even transferable between humans.
And you need to tell me this why?I also believe that these social emotional aspects are deeply wired together and have a intimate relationship with the aspects of attraction, such that to separate the two is ridiculous and ignorant.
Never said that. Again, you're showing your idiocy.Saying looks is all it is, is essentially saying that these systems of attraction are totally controlled and manipulated by physical visual cues exclusively.
DurrAfter all attraction is a complex process that encompasses both visual sights but also a whole entire mental and emotional experience, and that includes with men too.
HAHAHAHA. You don't get primality. And duh, that's why this information is valuable.I think the "primality" matters but I think you should also consider the subjective emotional social experience as well, and how to manipulate and influence it, both in others, and in your own self.
Primality is supposed to be the mental state of all mankind. At least, the most animalistic/ natural course of mankind.
Yes, but it is not just physical, but primal.Sex and attraction themselves are a social process, it's not just a matter of looking at something and finding it visually appealing. There is a whole social system to it.
Contemporaneous or Futural are both considered. Though sometimes again it varies. Depends on the value compass a girl holds. Hormonal hungerings are indeed capricious, and more fickle depending on every girl.So what is that social process? How does it work? And how important is it?
And how do you know how they feel about it? Clearly they are attracted from these other factors in some cases, otherwise, why would they spend time with and fuck these guys?
Aside from clear cases where the girl is using sex to get something like money or status, rather than actually enjoying the experience itself, how does either of you explain this? Cause so far you have not.
I would argue that it comes down to the emotions and vibe of the moment and that most certainly is something that can be affected alot by behavior
Primality capital is what I believe is what humanity desires from its primal instincts/ natural animalistic course/ the id. And the id is the root motivator for most of the thing mankind does. Edificality is the super ego, but it is my belief that it falls to the id in so many occasions. A lot of the time you need to understand what a woman hormonally hungers for. And there are indeed ways you can change it. But you need to do thorough studying of the way to do how. I'm just telling you that looks/ status/ money/ the primality capital inborn mold you come from is stained onto your existence. It will limit the bar of your primality capital. Which in turn makes girls like you less.
Primality is consisted not just of what people seek, but also what they like to feel. There are underlying primal reasons why people like funny guys, because humor is critical, only done in an underlying way. But I'm not talking about overextensive obnoxious sarcasm, but just subtle ironies explicated that make people's mindframes latch on to the insistence of a flaw. Insistence that seems inspirational/ uplifting/ etc. but is really the dead opposite. Indicating the manipulation of a positivity only society.
Primality is also consistent in everyday discussion/ swagship/ swagshow/ being cool (swag is indicative of someone having a cool/ chill vibe and just gains things right while maintaining the vibe of not giving a fuck... which can work and expicates value but remember, it's still on a scale. Some girls will want solid substance, others will want a fucking good time, which again, is conducive to being somewhat of a desperate fallback of ppl with low LMS. For ppl would rather get by being that which takes little effort/ always dominates/ what people are naturally drawn to/ the simpler it is for you the more things are checked off. You're not so weak in every field/ area that things are needing analysis and concentrated action/ meticulous focus.
In my mind swagness only really works with girls if you still have something to present. It's like you showcase/ shadowcast your value through your actions/ words/ behavior... and while it is still pitted against those who have aesthetic/ genetic/ competitive primality game, like a darwinian form of attraction where women predicate their lustings/ hormonal hunger primarily on who succeeds in all of the essential lines of survival/ power, the solid substance, there are certain perks to this verbal/ behaviorally artful form of dominarchical/ moderation primal capital. (Remember it falls under primal capital BECAUSE you can often sway women only with their primal instincts. At least the vast majority will have a Darwinian Primality capital game, and some will have a more emotional caprice, because remember this comes from hormones. There is Hormonal/ Capricious primality which MAY verge into edificality but it's not intrinsic to our hormones. Darwinian Primality/ Ideologized Primality... is like the Nazis/ Eugenicists who take our Nature as an inevitability/ a divine purpose and decide to work towards fulfilling the goal of perfecting our genes, while being instinctually in control. It has various forms as well, but it usually surrounds the notions of "let serve or let die", "one for all and all for one", etc.
But remember, that most will probably have some kind of edificality/ selection based on high moral standing and high minded/ tasteful considerations. Not just sluts who like LMS). It's multifaceted. But either way you will only be of value to them if you have what they desire, and teh definement of desire is still hierarchical. Personarchy, highly capricious also. Hormonarchy is usually who ranks highly on her everyday set of hormones/ her hormonal pull. And again, is usually very much laced in primality. Maybe edificality sometimes, but given human nature, probably rare. Personarchy is more of a blend sincep eople are indeed indivudals. Even still, you have to be of some distinctional idenitty. Distinctionarchy for example. Distinctional value on a girl's scale of intimacy value.
In conclusion being a swagfag can give you some game. But a lot of girls are hormonally absent enough to focus on a clear set/ scale and although swagsnagging their psyche can help out a little, it won't give them everything they need. A lot of girls are thinking about compatability/ not being a douchey swagfag/ thinking about the value that can make you win in a value v. value slugfest instead of what some machiavellian guy can offer. The notion that PUA can offer a skillset that can swagsnag their hormonal hungering is horseshit. It can work to some degree, but it's just one of the perks of a greater set.