I mean, women would give a fuck less about confidence compared to things that result in power, prominence, prowess in actual life. Confidence seems arbitrary and actually a downside. Being confident without real value is like a pig feeling like the hottest shit after he lost last in a horse race. It's pompous, arrogant and a bit offensive to incels who suffer insecurity for their low value. Who are willing to intellectually indulge in their inferiority. The person who has the least regard for their flaws/ managing their self worth should not win out. And it's hierarchical/ despotic/ unfair for those who have valid self worth still win over women. More so than incels who are insecure.
The notion you are supposed to be confident even if you are subhuman, which is often said to incels, implicitly means you're not supposed to care about what ppl think. That implicitly tries to make you stop manipulating people and gaining pretentious prestige/ new value from overcoming subhumanity and looksmaxing. It's usually a vice if the natural flow of your life results in rejection and failure, which it does. What the hell are you supposed to say to someone who likes power rangers/ picks their nose/ looks like gary coleman and jared had a baby. That confidence will help you? No, insecurity will. Insecurity will give him justified self doubt and start working out, changing his behavior, getting cool, and maybe, just maybe he'll be able to pull a chubby girl or an azn irrelevant. But again, if you tell confidence to a specimen such as that, it obviously has no functioning value in getting laid. It's implicit for him to be happy in himself amidst the damage it does to his self image and value in other people's judgment.
Liberalism's prevalence has everyone trying to find value in themselves. Where quartz has the same level of value as diamond to be palatable nadm ake it feel ebtter. This is really patronizing as you know for a fact that the purveyors of Liberalism are indeed HUMAN, and thus have HUMAN systems of judgment. There's no way they can cumulatively view an autistic spaz the same way they can view a movie star. It's disingenuous and designed to make the world free of drama just because they selfishly want nothing to break their own personal procedure of peace. And this is not a peaceful world.
I truly believe attractive people want Liberalism/ Humanitarian sentiments to be the prevailing norm because a positive emotional climate never threatens change against the things that are negatively affecting people's lives. People can remain assfucked by life with a happy heart, because that is the norm, and if they reject it explicitly/ outwardly, they lose more ground in status, and thus the fulfillment they are looking for. And I doubt that the people who have negativity with the situations can really gain enough traction/ momentum/ force to really alter the currents just by being in the low pitch of being without the same prominence the prevalent people have.
Besides, even if you do every publicized prevaricating procedure to get girls, they'll just stick with who has the highest prestige in the primarchy (primal hierarchy). pfft lol.
Last edited by Eugenicist on Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin