That their psyche is capriced around anything other than LMS/ Primal Capital. Yes their psychsturcture is capricious. They virtually have no self-awareness of what htey want, and it is primarily moved by stimulation... without a real intellectual build to file/ rationally contruct what they should or should not do.
So yes, they are capriced. But the ultimate fallacy is that their caprice can be swayed without any primal capital/ LMS at all. But like the PUAs think... immaterial capital. That can't be done. Anyone, and I mean ANYONE can cultivate immaterial capital in the mind of a female. Females want traits that exist in individuals that are exclusive to the birth/ status/ powero f an individual. This takes direct precedence above their egalitarianism, humanitarianism to other people. They pedestal high primal LMS prodigies, and minimize incels. Their real compass of consideration isn't whether you are human/ a living thing or an object/ not a person/ immoral... but how primally prowessed you are and how incel you are. Hence why they judge other people from snooty selectivity at the expense of giving them humanitarian aid. They think judging other people for their genes/ features isn't in direct contrast to humanitarianism. Bullshit. Or if they're not lying, they still don't want that truth to be emphasized. But that's because they unwarily want to conceal their underlying motivations from overstepping their virtue veneer/ presented personage. (Women want what they infer to be believed, and who they really are to be concealed by being unaware of it, feigning unawareness, or outright denying it.)
Women are predicated on materialism, and adopt humanitarianism/ egalitarianism for a few reasons. Material gain, and because they want to live in a diffused, non judgmental society so that they can blue-pill people to their deceptive devices. So they naturally create coddlesome climates that men follow suit with because they want to virtue signal/ veneer. Only so as to make everyone weak, unaware and able to be manipulated. Like a spider/ snake/ venomous that stuns and waits until its venom kicks in and then goes in for the feast. Women veneer with being light and loving, then blind people to the sub-stratum of primal judgment/ power struggle facet in the multifaceted social currents that stream on in everyday existence. So that they can dominate this vital currents while men are being cucked. It's the choice of weapon for a woman to fight in a non-tense environment/ atmosphere, so as to weaken the primality within men. That's how women manifest their primalescent power over the physiarchy/ primarchy. (One is concrete, one is status based).
But in fact it is. Humanitarianism isn't just in the belief that all people should be treated equally, it's in the attitude also. It's what you live by. Advocating an ideology when you don't really live by it is hypocritical/ pointless. Like saying you're a vegetarian because you want to protect animals when you go out eveyr friday night and gut open deer and dance in their gore nomming in it. The fact they abide by the belief without the attitude show they just veneer it for virtue signaling as it doesn't really come from being good people.
That they are mentally unorganized/ impulsively apprehended by sensual signals and not coordinated/ focused on tangibles. They are, but in a way that is compassed/ controlled by instinct and primal-set standards/ chemical impulses. That is the mental foreground/ foundation.
But their conscious intelligence that comes after it is beset by the chemical construction of the mind. Preset, not personally-set. These are Neuralnuances. And girls don't have the patience or will to ever be self-aware of them. But they are at least moved by them. Mankind is proud to have many of these vices and not to introspect to defy/ digest them. It's kind of pointless, they know the psychological array we were set up with is pointess to defect from. being nice and egalitarian leads to death.
But to believe that the chemical blitz that comes into their psychstructure tantalizes for immaterial connection... is wrong. No, their chemical structure IS indeed capricious. But its caprice revolves around the primarchy.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927