cperkins wrote:But it would be good if you could make an extensive summary of the points under discussion so we can argue it further.
Good articles. Do you want to expound on those further?
And in regard to the video itself, Communism/ Liberalism/ all forms of egalitarianism and humanitarianism are deceptions. Thoughtsets designed to destroy us in naivism/ false idealism/ concealism. The cope for the weak. Busted-Flush now as it's ultimately failed, and only the most overly sentimental denialist normie naivist. (Someone abiding by naive notions).
Humanitarianism is just making society unjudgmental of bad influences. Like allowing vermin into your home and calling them sentient/ soulholders/ other bullshit.
Thoughtsets eliminating the factor of merit, human judgment being innately racist/ categorical/ dark is definitely criminally dishonest. A lot of it doesn't have brutal realism. It's veyr indicative of a bullshit movement at best for making the world a truly better place. Which is impossible given human selectivity/ the inequality inclination within us all.
Going into the situation with a wrong thought process as your default is like a bird flying into a batcave. It's gonna die. Default thoughtsets should always be predicated on what is in the nick of existence. Not what isn't. And since so many women are afraid of what's taboo lest they see what will happen to them mouthing off/ living by that thoughtset, then they will be ostracized. Think about how individualistic/ primalitistic they are. They'd rather see civilization fall than be unpopular.
This is what most people don't get the reason we're humanitariani s because we're of this thoughtset from anxiety. Women are responsible of most all anxieties men have. Other men who are competitively superior (which is because they primarily get women better than they do is the essential reaosn why they're usch a nag) and the chaotic BS realm of the universe, and all of its cold, hunger, disease, predators, etc. Which is precisely why evolution made us hate eachother.
Think about it. Evolution programmed us to be competitive because we know there aren't enough resources to go around because of our greed for survival resources/ need to survive. That's why we were made to lie and detect lies in suspicion. That's why we were made to be tribal and elevate ourselves, and de-elevate others. Our evolutionary behavior implies that life has chaos and scarcity. We are greedy so as to suck up all the avenues of power, so as to control what people earn, get, deserve under what works for us in selfish desire for primacy. We're meant to be racist, and individualists.
Anyway, now. The reason white birthrates are so low is because white women are given to vanity/ are being pedestalled from an early age because of media hollywood platforming. White women expect it all, and are entirely predicated on the primarchy. Women reach for a value that only 1% of men can hold. And without that there's nothing.
Women essentially only got with men because of cultural pressure/ provision. Now with the former being an anachronism, and the latter being taken care of, now women are only going for bruce waynes/ james bonds/ brad pitts/ etc. By the time the girls who were unselected when they crowded over these guys is done, menopause. And autism. Which is a factor why I think might be responsible in the white children autism upsurge.
So yeah, a have it all or a one for none. Women want to have topdogs, not underdogs.
In the fringe cases where women get with non whites out of pressure not preference, they are trying to do that for status reasons. Not as prevalent in the 90s as being a trans or feminist though. The gangster rap scene which brings out your inner nigger isn't as big. I think people caught on to the propaganda there. But the soccer moms were born that decade, and some others too are being produced today.
Women like angular features, and often their givings are for the primal capital. They are tacitly racist and recognize the true topdogs are whites, and the obvious underdogs are non whites. They'll veneer differently for prominence and rarely for preference.