Women want Chad. Women though don't want ostracization. The genetic process of achieving Chad isn't far off from Hitler's Eugenics system.
But women benefit off of not making white men prominent again. They can run their victim veneering game constantly by insisting on any inequality anywhere, and you can't fight against it because the moral correctness of society has headway for the oppressed trump everything. Empathists. Women are not eugenicists, or people who care about anything aside from their own personal advancement. Their concerns are pillared far more on individual standing than the welfare of humanity. And the rarer value is, the more precious/ valuable it is also. Rarity is a gigantic portion of value.
Women aren't really against systems of oppression, because they all want to oppress with higher genetic/ primal capital which will put people in their agenda driven journey towards supremacy... they just don't want to be aware of it. Women only bring things into their awareness that have to do with their own selfish agenda for prominence... and completely brush off anything that makes them uncomfortable without any primal payoff associated with it. Even insecure girls shortcircuit their feeling of inferiority for bitchbliss. Women only hold mental burdens in association with status and prominence. We're a very narcissistic species.
Anyway yeah women want Aryan game. Anything against this is mostly ethnicope except if they're chimplovers. But the novelty of big dick gets pretty overshadowed by bulby features and no social skills/ status of any kind. Women want all of the gourmet on their trey from the buffet. LMS, Primal capital, etc. Women pillar all attraction characteristics on what gives dominance, and the superior presence. It is the evolutionary preset pursuit for women to get with the best oppressor. They just veneer being the oppressed ones, who don't like being oppressed until the humanitarian headway gives them the openings to defy those same virtues for getting with Chad, the apex oppressor.
Women don't truly believe in the virtues they espouse. Women are beasts of weaselry. They only decorate/ chameleonize their characteristics in relation to what gives them complete domination/ access in accordance with their predictions to what will get them what they want from life.
So even if they do espouse Hitler, their status substraction sense will filter out advocation of Hitler and just put their agreeance of his stance/ position as a subconscious notion, I.E. a notion they don't want to make public because they esteem their status more than anything that puts their primarchical position being at risk.
Women are evadists/ shirkists and are chiefly self focused. They wouldn't put themselves in the cold open for anyone's sake at all but their own primality compassed pursuits.
Women hide eveyrthing that rings a red flag in their social status threat sense. If Hitler/ Nazism were going popular today women would probably enjoy it more. Women like the imposition of cruel hierarchies that posit the powerful in a place where they can oppress and flaunt their value over others. Women fantasize of pounding people down. They just don't do it when they veneer victimhood for more power in our humanitarian hindered society, or when they're in a weaker position. Women are weasels when weak and demons when their day for dominance has come.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927