Spartacus wrote:I get being fine with looking at girls who are developed but isn't that guy Eric Marques behind a huge amount of prepubescent pics? Which is certainly not right. Interesting post though.
mrz wrote:Spartacus wrote:I get being fine with looking at girls who are developed but isn't that guy Eric Marques behind a huge amount of prepubescent pics? Which is certainly not right. Interesting post though.
welcome to CP redpill https://sexcrimetruths.wordpress.com/
(to further clarify, yes he hosted prepubescent pics too, but he really hosted anything. He ran Freedom Hosting, a hosting provider that gave people free hosting on the Tor network, which people used for a massive amount of purposes, from drugs, to jailbait, to CP, to carding, and much much more. He was not a producer of anything.)
mrz wrote:cliff notes:
1. CP possession legalization has correlated with a decrease in child sex abuse rates in every country ever studied
2. Males who don't look at CP are significantly more likely to sexually women than males who look at CP are to rape children
3. CP is not a big business and is hardly for profit at all, it's almost entirely traded freely on P2P networks
4. Contrary to popular belief, looking at pictures of child molestation does not cause the depicted children to be magically remolested. Harry Potter Theory, the theory that living beings exist in photographs, has been empirically disproved.
stirner wrote:I don't know Mrz, Do you have any specific goals for for your war against society? One minute you're saying that ER is more intelligent than you and the next you're saying that he's a "fucking idiot".
You sound like Tyler Durden from Fight Club wanting to build an army and all that shit. Have you seen that movie? It would be good porn for you.
You want people to read your stuff but you won't read other people's. I can't think anything other than that you're politically naive as well as naive in multiple other ways. The way you think is certainly damn interesting but you make it very hard to engage with you, which I have tried to do. I guess I'll see how things develop with you.
Castro wrote:Hopefully this is just a rant. There's nothing you can do to change humanity. It's a reflection of nature (i.e. that which is regardless of your or anybody else's disapproval.)
Nothing in a billion years, in a million revolutions, is going to change the fact that charisma is more appealing than intelligence, or that lawmakers take issue with grown men lusting after their developing daughters.

Your real issues are with your self and with nature. Can't handle 'em? No one's forcing you to stick around.
But my hope is you'll accept the innate and realize that life is way too short to waste time being vain, angry, and frankly, stupid.
mrz wrote:But there are other ways to change human mating system to be more beneficial for us. One method I propose is lowering the age of consent. Females are hypergamous, so young teenage boys will not be able to compete with guys in their later teens and twenties, which will flood the market for such guys and change the supply:demand relationship such that females will be sexually devalued, and this effect will snowball. Lowering age of consent is beneficial sexually for all males, and this is the approach I would suggest for improving the human mating system for males. So then the question is, how do we cause this goal to be actualized so that we can reap the benefits of it?
Ok, Let's go with this for a moment. The honest fact is that if there was magically no age of consent you wouldn't be having any more sex than you do now because the societal attitudes would still be the same. It's just like people didn't start getting weed for the first time when they made it legal in some states in America.
What would benefit you? Probably only some kind of totally totalitarian system whereby if you're part of the totalitarian elite then you get to do whatever you want. i.e like being one of the ruling class in North Korea or something.
Anything other than that and you're going to be rejected by the vast majority of women simply because they're 'neurotypical' and you are not. The mating systems that they innately respond to require you to give them the correct emotional inputs, which you are lacking.
Therefore I can only suggest that you try to at least fake those emotional inputs, just learn how to act as a human being and then produce the required emotions for you to be able have sexual relations with young women.
Surely you have the intelligence and ability to be able to do that? To interact with these primitive humans that you want to have intimate sexual relations with?
I think my book would certainly help you with the solutions to some of your problems but I can't post a 120,000 word book on here.
Superb Gentleman wrote:I don't understand the hate this guy is getting. Pretty much everything he said is true.


RodgerRabbit wrote:Just lol at living on this planet anymore.
hood rych wrote:Lmao, Mrz thinks 13 year olds actually want to hook up with 30 year old autists and not people in their peer group. Fucking delusional.
I don't understand the hate this guy is getting. Pretty much everything he said is true.
No, you're another aspergers case who feels powerful because he discovered TOR.


RodgerRabbit wrote:Just lol at living on this planet anymore.
mrz wrote:Is your book on netwar and propaganda and intelligence and mass control ?
djfranktank wrote:I never understood the need for u guys to watch CP
In terms of the lowing the age of consent thing I have always thought that it would make more sense to have it the age of the girl's first period as opposed to a generic legal age.
However as a stand alone thing I think you would have about as much chance of changing it as Osama bin Laden would of had of changing the law on crashing airliners into buildings.
Besides which, as I've already said I don't think it would make much difference. In terms of having sex in general I think your basic problem is that you now don't see yourself as part of humanity. So you're really in the same mental position as someone who wants to have sex with sheep or horses or the like.
Aside from a totalitarian state where you are part of the ruling class I think the system that would most benefit you would be one where women have no economic rights and are dependent on males for access to resources to live. That would mean that if you were an intelligent male with earning capacity you could acquire a harem of females.
The only problem for you with that system is there's absolutely no prospect of it happening.
The only person who comes to mind as getting a harem of females after claiming to be not human is Carlos Castaneda - Maybe you should look into his work.
Therefore could you please confirm that you're not planning any terrorist attacks, particularly against the United States?


RodgerRabbit wrote:Just lol at living on this planet anymore.
hood rych wrote:I know you think you're some sort of "good" child predator, because you'd never ever be interested in a 12 year old that's not developed.
But what about all the other child predators that have even worse intentions than you and like developed and undeveloped girls alike? Should they just be given a free pass to abuse positions of trust, manipulate, take advantage of young naive girls and boys and then leave them emotionally and mentally damaged because you like to look at CP?
Or should we decide that it would be better for our society if our children weren't free to be preyed upon while they are still developing into adults?
Also you always avoid my question: if you had a 12 year old daughter, would you let your 35 year old friends have sex with her if they deemed her developed enough?
Users browsing this forum: backagain, baldingcorpse, Bing [Bot], brahking, Endlösung, Etnatropin, European, Google [Bot], Gregory, kingincel, MyBalls YourChin, MyOwnSaviour, Redpilliseverything1, slayergene, The red tree, Twinky, Tyler Ballou, wegotdamunchies and 68 guests