Eugenicist wrote:When they pick an ideal mate based on eye color, race, height, hair, belly, nose, hands, legs, feet, arms, voice.
They are allowing America to become a genetic junkyard. With all the ethnicels coming into the country, they are fucking up what they desire most. Chad genes although they may have kids, eventually will have less whites to choose from as they are indeed being bred out. The recessive genes of darkies will fuck up the gene pool for men. Non whites having novelty will also cause miscegenation for women, as women choose with their hearts, and not rational objective estimations of genetic value.
Imagine girls love art, but they're advocating for Islam which destroys most art. That's what's happening today. Women like big dicks, but they don't even realize that'll be in shorter supply when the little dark men of the east grow in number. They should be aware of these things, but since they're basic, focusing on trivialities, not really that constructive psychologically, they don't prioritize it. Women don't prioritize rumination or introspection. They are primal animals who just want to fuck upwards and get to be a part of high end positions on the social hierarchy.
Dropping a red pill on them is like trying to hand over steak to a bear. Occasionally a bear will be graceful. But we all realize someone is stupid if you don't tell them what you want to hear. And the woman like the bear will probably eviscerate you. Death sentence.
I've never seen anything so irrational. The very design women have for mating is eugenic in nature. Liberalism says everyone has value. It's incongruent and contradictory.
It's virtue signaling and cognitive dissonance at play. They want to feel like they're 'good people' so they superficially support liberal causes like equality for all sorts of faggots and retards, including women as well (in a manner that is in no way self-serving no less!). Likewise, when they advocate for "body acceptance" and "abolition of gender roles" while simultaneously favoring dominant men with a masculine appearance, they reconcile this contradiction by telling themselves that it's somehow different due to women's right to personal preference, or that they chose the men that they chose to be with for different reasons.
I guess it's not really a fault with women in general. Most humans exhibit this sort of behavior in some way. It's how we sustain our fragile egos.
Their virtue signaling is transparent to me. Women may have a preference, but they're destroying it. They don't recognize it because their minds aren't logical enough, and even if they do realize it, their minds are very malleable to the conventions society's trends fed them. They'll see everything in proportion to the popular morality that society gave them.
I just don't understand that even if they are stupid, how can they not SEE that their preference for a white guy chad with a full head of hair and tall gets eliminated with the dump the liberals and non whites and jews are taking into the gene pool. It's like a lumberjack environmentalist, a muslim escort, a guy who likes T.V. yet joins, supports and votes for the party of politics that he knows are full of religious fanatics that think technology is evil.
For women, reverence for a guy's looks, genetics, quality is relevant. But self advancement, status, being on the winning side is prevalent. Because women care more about egotistical power than creating a civilization of purity. Women want a guy for his sexual value, but she'll be oblivious to maintaining or developing a rational outlook about why she likes this guy.
Women do need to sustain their self worth, their ego. But they cannot believe they are entirely good people. No one is. We all have stipulations for communication. I think most humanity basically hates one another. We aren't accepted unless we are presentable. People like to have the power to reject as much as they like to be accepted. Though we subconsciously love our capacity to reject others, we hate it when its done to us. We are all internally selective.
Women want white guys, most of the time. Women are liberal, to get white guys, most of the time. Yes, women have a preference. That is different than caring about liberal aims, like social freedoms, equality, etc. But, with how bitchy they get when a guy, who does not fit their criteria of interest, attention and regard, they will immediately cut that motherfucker out or swerve/ sidestep/ manipulate.
They base their self worth on superficial things. When they feel insecure about not looking good enough, and happy when they look good, they subconsciously know there isn't equality. Liberalism pollutes the mind with the notion that people as how they are are good enough, equal to eachother. But we subconsciously know that that is not true.
I MEAN, women judge themselves, their self worth almost entirely on their aesthetics. Genetics. But when it comes to liberalism, they say everyone, even third world ugly fucks have value? LOL. Women should not be fucking liberal. And their preference will be destroyed by the dysgenic spread of liberal values. It's disgusting. Their hypocrisy lol.
Women do not think in accordance with objective logic, clinical realism. Just like when measuring the worth of someone and their genetics. They are somewhat skewed. I wouldn't say measuring the worth of someone's genetics take the backseat, but they take the seat aside the one in the front. Semi conscious/ subconscious. They think in accordance with emotion/ novelty.