Just kys if you're not a liberal

Societal problems, economics, etc.

is zoophilia and gay porn liberal?
the only pets you need are teen sex slaves in your basement and the poneys you fuck in the barn

Image

Race is a gigantic factor in attractiveness and value. There are so many people who would throw their entire nigger/ potato family down a canyon valley to be white. Or even just to have blue eyes.

Most girls are only liberal because it's fashionable. But, like when they encounter someone they wanna cuck, they'll sidestep it with any sly rationalization that avoids the plain truth that they're just not of value. The same goes for girls who talk to non whites.

It's like this. Most girls will claim looks don't matter as a screen. Whether they're consciously aware they use this as artifice or they don't, it doesn't matter. Either way it procures them having an elevation in status. Being honest compromises their position on the social hierarchy. Some like being dishonest. Others aren't fully conscious of it because they're so immersed in the notion that the way things are are genetic transaction, and the front of saying it's not the case just allows the inferior to be content while the superior take what they want. --

And most girls will carry that notion to race and politics as well. Imagine there was one vietnamese guy in a world full of whites. 99% of girls would say he's outright deformed or mutated. Contrast to if he were a greek God, then he'd be hot. So, even if there is an exoticness to being unique, the vietnamese looks ugly by the standard a white society has set. But when it's an entire race of people, girls will save their status by not being racist and saying "he's just not my preference".

Women won't even fully realize their shallow preference to the point where they will base an ideology or operating system/ principles off of it. They're so cagey and secretive with their agenda that they wouldn't want to risk their personal position to spread the notion of eugenics in the first place. They are completely mercenary and will only invest in you if you have something to offer their personal agenda. They need to be Machiavellian to survive. Constantly getting raped and mistreated over history gave them a very opportunistic dirty coward mindset, where they will overstep any conscientious burden they have, with very few mental consequences like grief or sadness in lowering another to raise themselves. Women are extremely sensitive and afraid of pressure or tribulation.

I think it's because #1 they're frailer than men, that gives them a sense of seeking dominance and fulfilling their expectations not forwardly but with finesse. And because they see men's brutality, they begin to develop a lack of internal consideration for others. And the value hierarchy, they see that if they aren't of value, no one cares about them. So as a form of getting back at life, if someone is of no value to them, they don't care about others either. And they are genetically programmed by nature to breed out the weak. So they pay more heed to superficial visuals.

They are not liberal by nature. They are elitist. They only claim to be liberal because it gives them a higher social position. And because they're not mentally capable to be aware. Other things besides logic/ mental awareness take precedence over that. Social superiority is the ultimate parameter that codifies their self worth. And genetic quality. Women who say that they can find value in people, as if their perspective isn't selective,

Most girls don't want a genetically inferior non white. The only reason they want equality, liberal policies to exist is because they are trend minded. And their emotional perspective will have them acclimate to what feels the best as opposed to what actually makes sense.

If women were able to live by their real perspective, they'd be eugenic elitists? Why? Because they hate incels. They hate the genetically inferior. And they would hate themselves if they were genetically inferior too. Even 10/10 stacies are insecure to an extent.

Like a guy who has a low self esteem, and perfects everything around him, we should also attribute that to society and clean our own livingspace so we can be presentable. Exterminating people in a eugenic fashion will allow us to have a confident, clean planet free of all genetic abomination.

This would be the most benign thing. But Liberalism is a brain poison that give people the view of life that provokes value to virtue. But in reality people only find value in value, not virtue. Looks, money, status. Competence, achievement, ability. Charm, charisma, wits. Aloof, elite, powerful energy.

In reality people are selective snooty smug assholes. Just genetically breeding shit people is going to make them unmotivated, weak, careless, insecure. We will have an incompetent society. People are really only motivated by one thing. And that is EGO and pleasure and fear.

Cynicism is what the Manipulative and the Disparaging of Status (by assigning low value to those with a a bleak outlook on life) call Realism.
Image

“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest