Sacrificial Lamb wrote:Yes, I came back, fuckers....tough shit.
Nobody is surprised.
This site has a major problem with the proliferation of posters like mrz trying to push forward some type of agenda that focuses on glamorizing jailbait, quasi-pedophilia, and child pornography. There are idiots here with highly sexualized images of jailbait in their signatures. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that this nonsense is bad for the continued health of this site.
Sacrificial lamb, you are a closeted pedophile. I know this because in the teleiophile mocking thread I posted children, JBs, and old adults, and you mentioned I posted ugly looking children and adults but hot JBs, as if I could have posted sexually attractive children. I also know this because you called the Brooke Shields pictures jailbait, when in reality she was prepubescent when those pictures were taken, and you clearly can not distinguish JBs from children, because to you children are JBs.
This is perfectly fine, I know several pedos and have absolutely no problems with them as long as they don't molest kids. However, as you still repress and possibly even deny your pedophilic urges, you have some strange desire to loudly denounce anything that can be construed as attraction to anyone under the age of consent, and this is getting rather annoying. Virtually everyone likes JBs, the majority of the forum voted that we like JBs, JBs are legal in plenty of countries including several people on this forum live in, get over it. We are not going to censor ourselves just because a certain somebody has pedo guilt and feels the need to grandstand against anything related to thinking 17.9 year olds are just as capable of consent as 18 year olds are.
I never wanted to leave this place, but there are too many guys here posting sexualized images of girls between the ages of 12 to 15. It's fucked up, and I don't want to deal with the feds raiding this place....which they might do at some point.
Sexualized images of girls between 12 and 15 are legal so long as their sexual characteristics are not revealed and the camera does not zoom into their genital region. The feds could give a fuck less about a bunch of people posting non-nude JBs, if you actually knew the internet was larger than yahoo answers you would realize that illegal JB porn is not uncommon on several ostensibly adult porn sites, and would also realize that there are entire sites on the clearnet hosted in USA that are jam full of ephebophile aged girls in nudity and even soft sex. Feds are too busy going after uploaders and people with videos of infants being raped to waste their time raiding you because a maybe-17-maybe-18 year old tit got cached in your browser when you clicked a thread on sluthate. If people post illegal porn here, the feds are going to go after them, admin is immune to prosecution unless he doesn't remove it when it is brought to his attention, and there is no way the feds are going to raid everyone who accidentally stumbles on anything illegal, they would be wasting their time and they know it, and they especially are not going to do it over JB.
If anything they will target people who foolishly incriminate themselves without being anonymous (I highly suggest anyone who wants to talk about incriminating things gets a brand new username not linked to their old usernames, and only accesses it with Tor), and they will particularly be going after probably me and also anyone who talks about actually illegally fucking JBs, and anyone who posts actual illegal hard/young JB porn (ie: not none nude shit, not shit that is publicly hosted on primeassteens in the USA).
* poobear: He has a bunch of sexy images of some 15-year-old girl in his sig. Why? No good reason; that's why.
Sexy images of 15 year olds are not illegal. Why do you care?
* mrz: I really don't know where to begin with this autistic genetic deviant. He obsessively spends every day shitposting about jailbait, and has tried to tutor people on how to acquire child pornography. He even posted a nude image of an underage and sexually undeveloped girl in one of the threads on this site. In fact, he is in virtually every thread relating to jailbait, child pornography, and pedophilia. He's like a fucking cancer for the future health of this site,
and I'm not the only person who recognizes it. Hello, FBI!
Teaching people security for any reason is not illegal, there are plenty of sites instructing people in how to get away with murder. Also, viewing CP is legal in some countries, and I just want those people to know how to protect their privacy.
The nude photographs I posted were of Brooke Shields, and they are considered art by the courts of the USA. I'm sorry that you are so unsophisticated that you cannot differentiate between high class art and heinous acts of child abuse.
These are only a few examples. The problem is pervasive, and getting worse...
Look, admins....this is a fucking disaster waiting to happen. You guys do clamp down on spamming and excessive shitposting in some situations. Therefore, it would probably be a brilliant idea if you prevented posters from putting sexualized images of jailbait in their sigs, at the very least.
Creating a rule preventing posters from spamming threads with sexually charged jailbait pics would also be nice (and wise). This place is developing a reputation as the "pedo site".
How long will it be before the feds show up, and take legal action? Do you really want to tempt fate?
Why don't you go to 8chan and bitch at them? They have even younger legal pictures, surely the feds will do something to them before they do something to us? The feds can't do anything to this site because it isn't breaking any laws, but it's really kind of cute that you think sluthate is a CP site .