Women don't give jack shit about immaterial conceptions like "love, political affiliations, personality, identity, race" etc. Women don't itemize with conception. Their brains don't even itemize, or compartmentalize clearly; their psycoordination is a trackless stream of stimulus around them. Like aurora borealis that if surfing on = 1 feeling, and a different another. They're extremely right brained. One Aurora = Green = Glee. Red = Angry and so on. And their mind is too feeble and weak to tell itself what it is. And if they do, it's extrinsically motivated for their heavy-draw for one thing they are intrinsically motivated for. Impact. Or domination. And all things women like are not clearly defined. It's the psysurge they want. Like how a caveman neanderthal or a teenage kid can't describe why they like to fight and horse-around. They just do. That's women from womb to tomb.
Imagine a world where mouth-breathing numbskulls watch michael bay's transformers. Only the entire theater has those movies ALL the time. That's basically women 100%. They think the only thing which matters is impact. How you affect things, the physical realm is all that matters.And anyone who is a conceptist is a dweeb loser/ beta-inclined rotter. "It's the alpha way to always care about the impact, only losers are artfags". This is what gave rise to the rockstar trope. You combine musician and jock = rockstar or rapper. Musician is a more sensual person who has an undefined/ phenomenological intelligence. Women like that. They don't like people who have depth, or things that have depth. Organizing their psyche to prolongue animalistic phenomenology is a drag, a slog.
I mean women are so predicated on what is primal, phenomological, they must have a more superficial libido than men. They're more materialistic and everything. You can't realistically beleive women give a fuck about anything immaterial. That's a feminist fallacy.
This is what makes me believe women are so insecure about appearance and care more about the census than their actual merit/ substance. Women want to have the primality of power/ popularity. They can't achieve it without makeup/ deception/ careful presentation. So they choose to secure/ fasten and fashion the impact from gauging the census' view of them... than to produce substance independent from that.
This girl I knew, always kept her house superficially clean until I looked through her desks. Saw that they were all crammed and jumbled with stuff htorughout the house. I think girls take pride in the fact of being primally-predicated impactists with no reverence for conceptualism/ depth in anything... because it has a nastier/ snoot kind of vibe/ taste to it. And implies they are more adapted/ synchronized in the value systems of primality, and will give off the vibe they will one day succeed in it since they sacrifice so much in indiscriminate scuffle to meet those expectations.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927